Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257061 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-09-03 07:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > What I meant was that I browsed the source code, the docs, looked at the > agreements from the Microsoft docs used, and didn't see any obvious problems. > But IANAL, which is why I'd prefer someone with more technical knowledge and/or > more legal knowledge to double check. And what I meant is that this amounts to absolutely nothing and shouldn't even be mentioned. You have a patent system bogged down with tens of thousands software patents (not all belonging to Microsoft) full of obscure legalese that can be applied to anything. To take a "quick look" is just ridiculous. And nobody sane, much less a lawyer, would claim to be sure that certain code is not infringing someone elses patent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review