Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-09-02 06:46 EST ------- New packages at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/7/mindi-1.2.4-1.fc7.src.rpm ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/7/mindi-busybox-1.2.2-3.fc7.src.rpm and ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/6/mindi-1.2.4-1.fc6.src.rpm ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/6/mindi-busybox-1.2.2-3.fc6.src.rpm Working yum repo at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/7/fedora-mondo.repo ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/6/fedora-mondo.repo Is there still someone looking for this? I'd love to see this in the standard repository. Bruno, could you give some more information what makes it difficult to use the busybox package that's already in the repository? What specific additions or fixes did you add that can't go in the main branch? I'm just curious here and trying to build a bridge... Where are the source packages for afio and buffer? Wouldn't these be needed as well in Fedora and thus should also go through review? Could neither find .src.rpm nor review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review