https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557371 --- Comment #30 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- ... > > Including also alternatives, as spec contains > > alternatives --install %{_javadocdir}/java-zip javadoczip .... lines > > > > > > What do you think? > > Fix for javadoc-zip sounds okay to me. Is zip format for javadoc used by Not doing so at the end. I have overlooked that javadoc-zip have (correct) provides shared with javadoc. > many people? Just curious. It is! 99% of upstream releases contains javadoc as zip archive. all IDEs can index those zips... This is huge benefit, and Whole fedora javadoc strucutre should follow this and offer both variants. (as zips are not so useful outside ides or without programs like JavadocOfflineSearch) > > debuginfo and debugsource package info: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SubpackageAndSourceDebuginfo > > I'm not sure if these are supposed to apply for openjdk package. Do you know? Not usre here. IMho the debuginfo &comp are treated well forOpenJDK RPMs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
