https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554050 --- Comment #6 from Ian Hattendorf <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #5) > Please see: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/ > LicensingGuidelines#License_Text > > According to the MIT license: > > The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in > all copies or substantial portions of the Software. > > But the Source0 does not contain the license. Please contact upstream and > ask them to add the license text to the distributed zip file. If the > hesitate, you can add it as Source1 from http://gli.g-truc.net/copying.txt. It looks like the license was originally separate[0], but is now included as part of the manual.md file[1]. Should I replace`%doc manual.md` with `%license manual.md`? Or does the license need to be separate from documentation in this case, and therefore request upstream to re-add copying.md? [0]: https://github.com/g-truc/gli/commit/7308250d2f1d6f09ce2b51ff414c0de895ff319e [1]: https://github.com/g-truc/gli/blob/master/manual.md#section0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
