[Bug 1553835] Review Request: ocaml-utop - Improved toplevel for OCaml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553835

Ben Rosser <rosser.bjr@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |rosser.bjr@xxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from Ben Rosser <rosser.bjr@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Hi Sergey,

I was planning to submit a review ticket for this but hadn't gotten to it. I'm
happy to review it for you. :)

A few immediate thoughts:

1) It may just be personal preference, but I would suggest Providing "utop", as
this is both a library and application package. (I was going to name the
package "utop" and provide ocaml-utop).

2) If you BuildRequires: opam-installer, you can use the following to install:

export OCAMLFIND_DESTDIR=%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/ocaml
mkdir -p $OCAMLFIND_DESTDIR
jbuilder install --prefix %{buildroot}%{_prefix}

This doesn't *completely* do the right thing; I've found that it puts man pages
in the wrong place, for instance. But it's a bit better than manually copying
over all the files.

3) You likely need to Require emacs-filesystem, as I believe 
{_emacs_sitelispdir} will otherwise not be owned.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux