Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225667 opensource@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From opensource@xxxxxxxxx 2007-08-30 07:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Sorry again for the delay. No problem, thank you for your review. > Minor nitpick: any reason for not using %{?_smp_mflags} on your make ? I added it to cvs for devel and a scratch build worked fine, so I will keep it. > Do you plan to rename this over to cryptsetup? Yes, I already asked how to do this but got no satisfactory reply: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-August/msg00419.html The main issues are that there is already a cryptsetup Bugzilla component and that I do not know, whether someone will really take care, that the cryptsetup-luks and cryptsetup component in Bugzilla are merged. Also there seems no way to move the acls in the package db yet. For me it is no a high priority task to rename the package, therefore I want to wait until Fedora's infrastructure really support renaming packages. > I see no further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. > Feel free to close this rawhide. Thank you again. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review