https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #72 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> --- Just for been clear. The original problem with fdk-aac was never about patent (at least on the 3rd party level). It's all about copyright. You are not changing anything to the copyright if the patent is expunged from the library. So, the library still has to be considered as non-floss The uncertainty about the license condition would still apply. Now about RPM Fusion. We have a non-replacement policy for fedora packages in our default enabled repositories. So if you still decide to introduce this broken package (both legally and technically), then we will move our fdk-aac to a side repository that will need to be explicitly enabled. As I haven't see anyone to volunteer to maintain the fdk-aac-nonfree complementary package. It means that you will provide that package by default to users. And I'm afraid that without the complementary package, many users will have a broken experience of he-aac with fedora. The point is. If the goal was to restore the support relying on the external repository policy. Why just not only to rely on it in the first step and drop the fedora fdk-aac package ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
