https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547757 --- Comment #4 from Brett Lentz <blentz@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > But that's your job as a packager to package the missing dependencies. You'll end up with broken docs, which are an integral part of the package. I understand your perspective. I'm willing to work on those additional packages after this package is approved. Because there is no requirement in the packaging guidelines that all doc and testing dependencies "must" be met, this issue should not block this package review. > Yes but your Python 3 package is behind a conditional, so if you don't build with Python3, you should put the binary inside the Python 2 package. If you read the spec, the bin is not behind the conditional. If the conditional is not met, the bin will be included in the python2 package. > For now it is impractical because it depends on other maintainers to do their job, but as soon as the deps are updated, you should add the tests. Agreed. My plan is to work on the packaging for these additional dependencies after this package review is complete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
