Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-29 08:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #60) > Personally, I'm against pushing this package to Fedora. SEPostgreSQL is not > tested widely yet -- and it is thought as a replacement of original PostgreSQL. i disagree that SE-PostgreSQL is thought of as a replacement of PostgreSQL. furthermore, that concern could be addressed with adding sufficient warning to SE-PostgreSQL's %description. > If people, who are already running their databases on PostgreSQL, wants to > switch to SEPostgreSQL and if it is broken somewhere, it will harm the good > reputation of PostgreSQL in terms of stability. i think the reasonable conclusion is that SE-PostgreSQL is broken somewhere and to switch back to PostgreSQL. Fedora is on the leading edge of SELinux development, and thus is a perfect place to test this extension of PostgreSQL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review