Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: écolier-fonts - Écolier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-08-28 20:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I'm not too worried about the non-utf8 locale case: > 1. utf-8 is the default fedora encoding, so that's what we should optimize for I am not sure that it is relevant here. The issue is would it be right to have encoded characters in a package name. > 2. almost every fedora locale migrated to utf-8 long long ago No, the otherwise encoded locales are still there, like fr_FR. > 3. I thoroughly doubt any user of a non-utf8 locale (be it because this locale > is some complex obscure asian stuff or be it because the user is an US sysadmin > which has not understood i18n needs yet) will be interested in this particular > package Even if the user isn't interested in this particular package, the package name may still appears somewhere (in repoquery calls, for example). Or as a dependency. I don't feel strongly about that issue, but I have seen so many trouble with encodings that I think it is better to be cautious. I know some people still using 8 bit locales. That is a situation we shouldn't prevent, and we should leave this choice to the user (even though we are more targetting utf8). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review