https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538658 --- Comment #13 from Satoru SATOH <ssato@xxxxxxxxxx> --- FYI. I've released the new version 0.9.4 contains rpm related fixes and ... (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #12) > (In reply to Brett Lentz from comment #11) > > (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #10) > > > > %global sum Python library to load and dump configuration files in various formats > > > Using normal Summary: and then %summary subsequently saves one line ;) > > > > > > > Not true. The summary is used in 3 places because of the python2 & python3 > > sub-packaged. The macro saves copy/pasting the same text in 3 places. :) > > I didn't mean copying the text three times. I meant something like this: > Summary: blah blah blah > ... > Summary: %summary > ... > Summary: %summary > > Macro %summary is automatically defined to the contents of the last Summary > line. I didn't know this works. Thanks a lot for letting me know. Fixed it in the upstream. > > > During build I see the following error: > > > > import cbor > > > > ImportError: No module named cbor > > > Is some dependency missing? To keep dependencies at a minimum, anyconfig can process most ImportError-es at runtime correctly and works well w/o some dependencies like cbor are missing. And the new version becomes dependent on only some popular libraries by default, so this kind of error disappears as much as possible, I think. > > > and later: > > > > toml.py:docstring of anyconfig.backend.toml.Parser._load_from_stream_fn:6: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. > > > > /builddir/build/BUILD/python-anyconfig-RELEASE_0.9.3/anyconfig/backend/xml.py:docstring of anyconfig.backend.xml._tweak_ns:4: WARNING: Field list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. > > > > /builddir/build/BUILD/python-anyconfig-RELEASE_0.9.3/docs/api/anyconfig.cli.rst:4: WARNING: autodoc: failed to import module u'anyconfig.cli'; the following exception was raised: > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > > > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx/ext/autodoc.py", line 658, in import_object > > > > __import__(self.modname) > > > > File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-anyconfig-RELEASE_0.9.3/anyconfig/cli.py", line 42, in <module> > > > > sys.stdout = codecs.getwriter(_ENCODING)(sys.stdout) > > > > File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/codecs.py", line 1009, in getwriter > > > > return lookup(encoding).streamwriter > > > > TypeError: lookup() argument 1 must be string, not None > > > > done > > > > > This looks like a bug in the docs. I'll point it out to upstream. > Great. Still I've been looking into this and may take some time to fix them unfortunately. But I don't think it's critical for packaging. > > > And now the hard part: what is the difference in behaviour or output between > > > anyconfig-2 and anyconfig-3? > > > > There is no difference, AFAICS. > OK. If there is no difference, then only one version of the executable > should be packed. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Executables_in_.2Fusr.2Fbin: > > If the executables provide the same functionality independent of whether they are run on top of Python 2 or Python 3, then only the Python 3 version of the executable should be packaged. > > You went through the effort to get the symlinks right, but it now seems that > not actually necessary ;( Fixed in the upstream. Brett-san, could you please take a look at the RPM SPEC template in the upstream and try to arrange the new version of RPM SPEC and srpm? I tried to keep there are least differences between mine (upstream) and yours as much as possible but maybe there are issues remained I'm not aware of or forgot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
