https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 --- Comment #13 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jaroslav Prokop from comment #11) > The Guard::RSpec::RSpecProcess failures are happening because bundler is > needed for them and the upstream does not seem to mention that or require it > at all in the file. Well, upstream is executing the test suite using Bundler, so in that case Bundler is always loaded. The question is if we want to include Bundler as build dependency or not. Both options have their pros/cons. (In reply to Ilya Gradina from comment #10) > (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #9) > > Why are the Guard::RSpecFormatter tests failing anyway? It seems the time is > > now formatted differently. Is it Ruby 2.5 thing? Or some incompatibility > > with latest RSpec? Isn't there patch available upstream already? > > Hi Vit, thanks for the remarks. > I had two kinds of errors: Guard::RSpec::RSpecProcess, > Guard::RSpecFormatter. Option "rspec --tag ~..." did not work for me, so I > used "--exclude-pattern". > > new spec: > https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-guard- > rspec.spec You still don't have any remark in the .spec file why you exclude the tests :( That is always very essential to understand why something was done. > also there is open issue with Guard::RSpecFormatter: > https://github.com/guard/guard-rspec/issues/405 This does not appear to be related. I'd say that a bit more related is https://github.com/guard/guard-rspec/pull/403 because it enables upstream to test against more recent versions of Ruby, although it still does not include tests against Ruby 2.5 or ruby-head :( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
