[Bug 1310434] Review Request: python-wxpython4 - new implementation of wxPython (Phoenix)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434



--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
License file LICENSE_BSD_Simple.txt is not marked as %license.

/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/wxPython-4.0.1-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/wx/lib/pubsub/LICENSE_BSD_Simple.txt
/usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/wx/lib/pubsub/LICENSE_BSD_Simple.txt

Found multiple licenses, will attach licenses.txt.


License files installed when any subpackage combination is installed: No
license in docs. However media and webview does not need licenses, as they
require the main packages.

There are wxWidgets in ext/wxWidgets, are those used or not? If not, can the
folder be deleted, just to make it clear?

Rpmlint screams on me: bad shebangs, bad end of lines, bad utf8, bad executable
bits. Will attach rpmlint.txt with some filtering done by hand.

Python 2 installs to
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/wxPython-4.0.1-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/wx/...
ehile Python 3 installs to /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/wx/... - I
suppose that's related to the easy_install invocation. IS this not to conflict
with wxpython 3? That however installs to
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/wx-3.0-gtk3/wx/...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux