https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114146 --- Comment #12 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Julian C. Dunn from comment #11) > This all seems reasonable. I updated it to rubygem-ffi-yajl 2.3.1 and > rebuilt it There is missing changelog entry, but this is just minor nit. > Are we good to go on this now? Well, I am, but since I proposed this, I don't think I am eligible to approve this. BTW it would be probably better to have the runtime dependency directly on the libyajl library instead of the package, i.e.: ~~~ Requires: libyajl.so.2()%{_isa} ~~~ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
