https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103 --- Comment #21 from Jan Pokorný <jpokorny@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Regarding licenses, we have the situation with multiple licenses involved. What do the guidelines[1] have to say: > The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the > binary rpm. [...] > If a source package generates multiple binary packages, the License: > field may differ between them if necessary. This implies that a > single spec may have multiple per-subpackage License: tags. README.license file makes the distinction clear: applications (executables) vs. libraries. Brief look suggest this pairing of subpackages: * libraries: - lib*.rpm * application/executable: - kronosnetd*.rpm Respective subpackages should receive the license tag individually per the above dichotomy ("LGPLv2+" and "GPLv2+", respectively). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
