Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257341 panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora_requires_release_note|fedora-review? |? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-08-28 00:03 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. e1dd69f43d734f3a3faa67a735ac68d4 obexfs-0.11-rc2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Requires: libbfb.so.0 libbluetooth.so.2 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2 libfuse.so.2 libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.5) libmulticobex.so.1 libobexftp.so.0 libopenobex.so.1 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) librt.so.1 libusb-0.1.so.4 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review