https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #9 from Ron Olson <tachoknight@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ron Olson from comment #8) > I've been playing around with a downloaded copy of Swift in conjunction with > an installed copy of lldb and I believe that the swift binary is explicitly > looking for lldb in the same directory to run the REPL; I've asked on the > Swift forums to confirm my findings. > > It seems that the copy of lldb is inclusive of existing functionality (i.e. > I tested that it also debugs C/C++ executables as well), but that doesn't > really matter insofar as it's not the same copy that ships with the existing > lldb rpm. I believe the lldb that is included with Swift is essentially a > fork with additional functionality to support Swift. > > I'd like to float the possibility of allowing the installation to be put in > /opt/fedora per > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Limited_usage_of_.2Fopt. > 2C_.2Fetc.2Fopt.2C_and_.2Fvar.2Fopt. I'm looking to get more > information/confirmation from the Swift group before making the formal > proposal. I was looking at the wrong repo for llvm/lldb...they seem to have references to Swift so I'm currently building the latest version of llvm/lldb and see what's available; it may be possible to just tie Swift with a later version of LLDB so that the two can coexist. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
