https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534188 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> --- [+] rpmlint is silent (or produces only messages which can be safely ignored: Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/erlang-fs-4.1-1.fc27.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/erlang-fs-4.1-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm erlang-fs.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US inotify -> notify, i notify, bogotify erlang-fs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US inotify -> notify, i notify, bogotify erlang-fs.x86_64: E: no-binary erlang-fs.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: See Erlang packaging Guidelines for the explanation of these warnings - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Peter/Erlang_Packaging_Guidelines [+] The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [+] The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [+] The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. [+] The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (ISC). [+] The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc and marked as %license. [+] The spec file is written in American English. [+] The spec file for the package is legible. [+] The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum fs-4.1.tar.gz* 3dafd86145ca37aa3bbd69706ef8586f81f7eea89b29d01eb51a609609545303 fs-4.1.tar.gz 3dafd86145ca37aa3bbd69706ef8586f81f7eea89b29d01eb51a609609545303 fs-4.1.tar.gz.1 Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: [+] The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms. [+] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. [0] No need to handle locales. [0] The package does not contain any shared library files. [+] Packages does not bundle copies of system libraries. [+] The package isn't designed to be relocatable. [+] The package owns all directories that it creates. [+] The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] Permissions on files are set properly. [+] The package consistently uses macros. [+] The package contains code, or permissible content. [0] No large documentation files. [+] Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. [0] No static libraries. [0] No -devel sub-package. [+] The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. [0] Not a GUI application. [+] The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. I've spotted only the following two issues: * Missing Requires: inotify-tools * Erlang dependency generator complains about not available M:F/A, so the following patch is required - https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-fs-0001-Unbundle-https-github.com-synrc-mad.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
