https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472 --- Comment #6 from Tomas Popela <tpopela@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #5) > yes webkit2gtk , maybe the correct name , also checked arch Linux [1] > > - Look at this commit [2] internally is webkit2gtk-4.0 > - When Gtk+ 4 [3] the same webkit2gtk IIRC should support the 2 gtk+ 3 and 4 > . > > For these reasons, IMHO, seems to me webkit2gtk is more appropriate , or > even webkit2gtk-4.0 (with - , to not confuse with gtk4) . > > Best regards, > > [1] > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/webkit2gtk/ > > [2] > https://github.com/hyperair/geany-plugins/commit/ > 1fd266a97b9fedb0ae463a2cf9a409af27bb0ae6 > > [3] > https://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2016/06/13/gtk-4-0-is-not-gtk-4/ > https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GTK%2B/Roadmap/GTK4 Could be, but from webkit2gtk you can't distinguish anything and we are on the same boat as we are now before the rename. But with webkit2gtk3 you can clearly distinguish on what WebKit and GTK+ versions it is based on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
