https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531051 --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Types-UUID-0.004-1.fc28.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.26.1) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(Type::Library) 1 perl(Types::Standard) 1 perl(Type::Tiny) >= 1.000000 1 perl(UUID::Tiny) >= 1.02 1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.8.0 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Types-UUID-0.004-1.fc28.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Types::UUID) = 0.004 1 perl-Types-UUID = 0.004-1.fc28 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Types-UUID* perl-Types-UUID.noarch: W: invalid-license Artistic perl-Types-UUID.src: W: invalid-license Artistic 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Rpmlint is ok (invalid lisence warnings) The package looks good. Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx