Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data Alias: perl-Encode-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Alias| |perl-Encode-Detect ------- Additional Comments From cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-24 11:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Yeah, the Fedora Packaging Guidelines don't speak that much on building perl > modules. What I used, I originally copied from a RHEL package. (I have > multiple other perl packages I want to contribute, which is why I'm waiting for > this one to be reviewed before I proceed.) There is a collection of perl packaging "best practices" under https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Perl . Note that these aren't official guidelines, but are generally what perl reviewers will use when looking at a package. > The reason why I don't use %{module} et. al. macros in Source0: is because I > always download the source by copying-and-pasting it into a wget command. I > actually like having the additional edit; it forces me to Do The Right Thing > whenever I grab a new version of the package. An interesting approach :) I find "spectool -g foo.spec" helps to download new versions of sources with slightly fewer mouse/key strokes than wget. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review