https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266847 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for reviewing. (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #7) > You should split the doc in a separate subpackage. : > ===== EXTRA items ===== > > Generic: > [!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package > is arched. > Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1320960 bytes in /usr/share Did we discuss this before? Current Fedora Haskell Packaging doesn't play well with doc subpackaging. I am planning to subpackage docs in a future Fedora release, though -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
