Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-24 03:12 EST ------- Thanks for the update. (In reply to comment #6) > > I wonder if it would be useful at all or make sense to consider subpackaging > > the gothic and mincho fonts? (Anyway that could also easily be done later > > if it is useful since they are in the same tarball anyway.) > > It could be. I'm not sure how much it's useful. but yeah I can. Okay, thanks, looks good to me. :) Some basic users of Japanese may just be happy with gothic. > > W: sazanami-fonts symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/sazanami-fonts > > /usr/share/fonts/sazanami-fonts > > Hmm, I'm not sure about it. there were some discussions but I don't see any > conclusions at the mailing list that started Threads from: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-July/msg00444.html > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-August/msg00096.html Thanks for digging out the thread. :) Anyway it is not a blocker anyway. I got the impression the preference was for relsymlinks for better behaviour in a chroot tree but for fonts maybe it is not such a big issue. > nor any updates at the wiki: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureNoMoreXFS I agree this should be updated first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review