[Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240





------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah@xxxxxxxxx  2007-08-23 08:32 EST -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> Hi Adel,
> 
> 1. There as some unused-direct-shlib-dependency issues on liblinkage-1.so.0.0.3.
> 
> See discussions at
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-June/msg00176.html
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-January/msg00158.html
> 
> There's a "hack" used in a number of packages already (alliance, clamav), that
> simply patches the "-Wl,--as-needed" option into libtool right after configure.
> That looks to me like the simplest option. 
>
 
ok thx, added this hack for now.

> 2. The --prefix and --libdir options to configure are not necessary

removed.

> 3. libupnp-devel BR is not needed. The package looks for libgupnp, which appears
> to be something completely different (and not in fedora as of yet).

upstream changed the upnp lib in 0.1.4 removed this for now (package not in fedora)

Updated package:

http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage.spec
http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage-0.1.4-3.fc7.src.rpm



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]