Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah@xxxxxxxxx 2007-08-23 08:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Hi Adel, > > 1. There as some unused-direct-shlib-dependency issues on liblinkage-1.so.0.0.3. > > See discussions at > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-June/msg00176.html > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-January/msg00158.html > > There's a "hack" used in a number of packages already (alliance, clamav), that > simply patches the "-Wl,--as-needed" option into libtool right after configure. > That looks to me like the simplest option. > ok thx, added this hack for now. > 2. The --prefix and --libdir options to configure are not necessary removed. > 3. libupnp-devel BR is not needed. The package looks for libgupnp, which appears > to be something completely different (and not in fedora as of yet). upstream changed the upnp lib in 0.1.4 removed this for now (package not in fedora) Updated package: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage-0.1.4-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review