https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510565 Pavel Zhukov <pzhukov@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx Flags| |needinfo?(mlichvar@redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #10 from Pavel Zhukov <pzhukov@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Revuew is below. Few remarks: 1) You are using %makeinstall macros while Makefile is pretty simple and either make install prefix=%{DESTDIR}/%{prefix} can be used or Makefile patched to accept DESTDIR (upstream first). https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used 2) Description should start with capitalized letter as normal English sentense Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/pavel/work/bugs/bz1510565/ntpstat/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [!]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. Note: %makeinstall used in %install section [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [!]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Rpmlint ------- Checking: ntpstat-0.4-2.fc26.noarch.rpm ntpstat-0.4-2.fc26.src.rpm ntpstat.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US synchronisation -> synchronization, synchronicity ntpstat.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ntpd -> DuPont ntpstat.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US chronyd -> chronic ntpstat.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US synchronisation -> synchronization, synchronicity ntpstat.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ntpd -> DuPont ntpstat.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US chronyd -> chronic 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ntpstat.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US synchronisation -> synchronization, synchronicity ntpstat.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ntpd -> DuPont ntpstat.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US chronyd -> chronic ntpstat.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/mlichvar/ntpstat <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Requires -------- ntpstat (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (ntp or chrony) /bin/bash Provides -------- ntpstat: ntpstat Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/mlichvar/ntpstat/archive/0.4/ntpstat-0.4.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 1ededcbf55599c4388ff181c18a2b60ca214793059d77f9aadd26d6bc33284f8 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 1ededcbf55599c4388ff181c18a2b60ca214793059d77f9aadd26d6bc33284f8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
