Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-23 05:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks. > > Just a few initial comments/questions: > > It would probably be good to add a comment explaining how and why > the tarball was rolled with a reference to bug 196433. > > Eventually it would be nice if it could be built from source. Well, upstream only puts the binary, ttf files. the source code (almost is a common lisp code) is only available on CVS though, it quite depends on the env it seems and isn't supposed to be built usually by users. > I wonder if it would be useful at all or make sense to consider subpackaging > the gothic and mincho fonts? (Anyway that could also easily be done later > if it is useful since they are in the same tarball anyway.) It could be. I'm not sure how much it's useful. but yeah I can. > rpmlint on the binary package gives: > > W: sazanami-fonts symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/sazanami-fonts > /usr/share/fonts/sazanami-fonts Hmm, I'm not sure about it. there were some discussions but I don't see any conclusions at the mailing list that started Threads from: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-July/msg00444.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-August/msg00096.html nor any updates at the wiki: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureNoMoreXFS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review