https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510565 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Zhukov <pzhukov@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Miroslav Lichvar from comment #2) > Thanks, I'll fix that in the next release. Would you like to do a full > review? > > In order to not lose ntpstat after an upgrade, I was planning to add > Recommends or Requires to the ntp package, but I'm wondering if there is not > a better way. If ntpstat obsoleted the old ntp package and required "(ntp or > chrony)", I suspect an upgrade could result in an installed ntp being > replaced by chrony as the new requirement would be satisfied without ntp. What about: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:WeakDependencies#Real_life_example ? Both chrony and ntp should provide some "service" and ntpstat should depend on this "service" and suggest chrony as preferred provider. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
