https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513175 --- Comment #3 from David Shea <dshea@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Omer Anson from comment #1) > Hi, > > rpmlint says the following for the srpm: > Error checking signature of ghc-natural-transformation-0.4-1.fc27.src.rpm: > ghc-natural-transformation-0.4-1.fc27.src.rpm: digests SIGNATURES NOT OK > > rpm -Kv complains about: > Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 76551145: NOKEY > V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 76551145: NOKEY Packages in COPR are signed with a repo-specific key, so you need to have that imported if you want to check the signatures. The one for this repo is at https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@weldr/bdcs-haskell-deps/pubkey.gpg The packages are, of course, not signed with the Fedora package key. That's part of what this bug is for. > The changelog in the spec file does not match the contents in the package > site. I'm not seeing that. $ curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/weldr/bdcs-copr/master/ghc-natural-transformation/ghc-natural-transformation.spec | grep -A 3 '^%changelog' %changelog * Fri Sep 29 2017 Fedora Haskell SIG <haskell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 0.4-1 - spec file generated by cabal-rpm-0.11.2 $ rpm -q -p --changelog https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@weldr/bdcs-haskell-deps/fedora-27-x86_64/00611297-ghc-natural-transformation/ghc-natural-transformation-0.4-1.fc27.src.rpm * Fri Sep 29 2017 Fedora Haskell SIG <haskell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 0.4-1 - spec file generated by cabal-rpm-0.11.2 (In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #2) > I can not reproduce the issue, but build on f27 fails > + export LDFLAGS > + '[' -x Setup ']' > + ghc --make -no-user-package-db -dynamic Setup > /usr/lib64/ghc-8.0.2/package.conf.d/package.cache: openBinaryFile: does not > exist (No such file or directory) > RPM build errors: > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GFG8gK (%build) > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GFG8gK (%build) > Child return code was: 1 > EXCEPTION: [Error()] How are you building the package? This looks similar to an issue we had with mock --newchroot. Up until very recently (recently enough that I don't think a new version has hit 27 yet), --newchroot ran the buildroot setup without /proc mounted, which is a problem for the ghc-* package scriptlets, causing the ghc package database to not be generated. Obviously it can be built for F27, as evidenced by the COPR build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
