https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510877 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jančo <jjanco@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #15) > [?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses > found: "Artistic (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 18 files have > unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in > /var/tmp/rev/1510877-perl-LMDB_File/licensecheck.txt > > RWMJ: The LICENSE file is Artistic. The source files in the package > don't seem to contain any license text. The License tag in the spec > file is "GPL+ or Artistic". Is that correct? There is no problem > with the license itself, it's all open source. > > [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. > [?]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown > must be documented in the spec. > > RWMJ: See above. According to http://search.cpan.org/~sortiz/LMDB_File-0.12/ it is only Artistic 2, I didnt find any other licenses. Changed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
