Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253757 rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-21 16:06 EST ------- Some comments after a quick glance: Tarball versioning suggests that these files are for tesseract version 2.0. I think you should use Requires: %{upstreamname} = %{version}. They might work with newer releases, too, but check with upstream if this is true or not. In each %files section, you should mark the files using the %lang macro, i.e.: %lang(fr) %{_datadir}/%{upstreamname}/tessdata/fra* I might do a formal review in a few days, if nobody beats me to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review