Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@xxxxxx 2007-08-21 07:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) Not a full review, just a few observations: > E: java-1.7.0-icedtea binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/jre/bin/keytool > ['$ORIGIN/../lib/i386/jli', '$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/i386/jli'] > > rpmlint should check for $ORIGIN before issuing this message since $ORIGIN > rpaths are not hard-coded. Not all $ORIGIN RPATHs are desirable anyway though. See /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths-worker in >= 4.4.2.1 rpm-build versions (or rpmdevtools <= 5.4) and/or try building the package with these checks enabled (see rpmdev-setuptree) to see if it flags them as bad. > W: java-1.7.0-icedtea uncompressed-zip > /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/jre/lib/jsse.jar > > This is an rpmlint bug: the jar file is compressed. Can you upload the binary package or just the jsse.jar which triggers this message somewhere so I can check what's up? > E: java-1.7.0-icedtea-demo invalid-soname > /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/demo/jvmti/mtrace/lib/libmtrace.so > libmtrace.so > > These files are meant to be dlopen'd, not linked-to directly, so they should > not have a versioned soname. Isn't versioning the very purpose of sonames? What would a versionless soname be useful for? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review