https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #42 from Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Oh, and for the technical issues: (In reply to Wim Taymans from comment #34) > Comment #11: why not have fdk-aac-stripped? > - Looking at freetype, and because the library is API and ABI compatible, > it's better to have fdk-aac as the base name for the -devel and -debug. > That way all packages can build against the more natural fdk-aac-devel > and have the -freeworld package enhance it at runtime. You can build fdk-aac-{stripped,free,patentfree,whatever} and fdk-aac-devel from the same package, either a fdk-aac.spec with no main package, or by using %package -n, or by using a virtual Provides (Provides: fdk-aac-devel in the %package devel of your fdk-aac-*.spec). So I still don't think shipping this as just fdk-aac is helpful, both for honesty to users and for upgrade path reasons. The model to follow is gstreamer-plugins-bad-free, not freetype, which is the way it is for historical reasons mostly. But of course this discussion is absolutely moot if the license turns out not to be acceptable to begin with. Debian's opinion does not per se count, but the FSF needs to be asked. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
