https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #39 from Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller <cschalle@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Fedora Legal aka Red Hat legal has reviewed this license and is fine with it as a free license. What the FSF or some random people at Debian thinks is of very limited interest here. So can we please stop playing laywer here and leave that to the actual lawyers. As for the name of the rpmfusion package that will be up to rpmfusion and we should not spend time discussing it here. What we need to figure out here is how we package this code in Fedora and how we can structure it in a way that allows other parties like rpmfusion to enhance the offering if they are interested. I think Wims proposal addresses that pretty well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx