Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-08-16 18:58 EST ------- I cannot rebuild texlive: $ rpmbuild -bp texlive.spec error: Failed build dependencies: texlive-texmf = 2007 is needed by texlive-2007-0.9.fc8.i386 texlive-texmf-afm = 2007 is needed by texlive-2007-0.9.fc8.i386 texlive-texmf-dvips = 2007 is needed by texlive-2007-0.9.fc8.i386 texlive-texmf-fonts = 2007 is needed by texlive-2007-0.9.fc8.i386 texlive-texmf-latex = 2007 is needed by texlive-2007-0.9.fc8.i386 And then, yum install texlive-texmf texlive-texmf-afm texlive-texmf-dvips texlive-texmf-fonts texlive-texmf-latex ends with: Running rpm_check_debug --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package texlive-texmf-errata-afm.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-errata-fonts.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-latex.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-errata-latex.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-dvips.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-common.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-errata.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-errata-common.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-fonts.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-errata-dvips.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-afm.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: Package latex2html needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package tetex-elsevier needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package secante_conf needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package xmltex needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package jadetex needs tetex-latex >= 3.0, this is not available. Package linuxdoc-tools needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package tetex-frogg needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package a2ps needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package tetex-tex4ht needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package passivetex needs tetex, this is not available. Package jadetex needs tetex >= 3.0, this is not available. Package jadetex needs tetex >= 3.0, this is not available. Package bibexport needs tetex, this is not available. Package texinfo-tex needs tetex, this is not available. Package a2ps needs tetex-fonts, this is not available. Package tetex-elsevier needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package tetex-elsevier needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package tetex-frogg needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package tetex-frogg needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package tetex-tex4ht needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package tetex-tex4ht needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package bibexport needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package bibexport needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package latex2html needs tetex-dvips, this is not available. Package docbook-utils-pdf needs tetex-dvips, this is not available. Package tetex-xdvi needs tetex-dvips = 3.0, this is not available. Package a2ps needs tetex-dvips, this is not available. Complete! I am not sure that it is a good idea to have Obsoletes: tetex-afm <= 3.0 Provides: tetex-afm = 3.0 It seems to me that tetex-afm = 3.0 is then provided and obsoleted at the same time, it may be wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review