Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 ajackson@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ajackson@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-16 17:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > * Please choose one of GPL+, GPLv2, GPLv2+, GPLv3, GPLv3+. See various mailing > list threads about it. Also, I'll note that one of the files you install > (/usr/share/doc/bootchart-0.9/LICENSE.compress.txt) mentions the Apache License. > Might want to figure out what's up with that. Everything looks to be v2+, but then also links against org.apache.commons.compress.tar, which is Apache 2.0. So I'm just claiming it's GPLv3+ for now. I'll ask upstream what they really mean though. > * System Environment/Base seems to be the right group for the logger Done. > * Preserve your file timestamps by using the -p flag to install(1) Done. > * There's a new preferred buildroot of the day, it appears, though you're using > the second-best version of it. Just figured I'd point that out since it humors me. Done. > * I'll assume this builds under mock. If it doesn't you'll find out when you > try to build into koji. Yep. > * Also, is this package really useful without the logger subpackage? Might > consider killing the subpackage. Yeah, it's sort of backwards. The core package is the renderer, the logger is the init wrapper. I could do it as bootchart / bootchart-renderer I guess? The intent is to just have bootchart-logger always active, and let people either render stuff themselves or go to the web UI for it on bootchart.org. New packages and spec at the same URL as before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review