https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- > Or just epoch the stripped package. I assume you mean the unstripped one? But replacing Fedora packages that way is against RPM Fusion policy, the user must opt in to every *-freeworld package explicitly. > > Looks like we need an fdk-aac-freeworld. > > In fact why do we? > I believe the fedora fdk-aac package should be renamed to fdk-aac-stripped and > use it's own directories to avoid conflicts. The advantage of doing a -freeworld (set up like freetype-freeworld or qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld) is that it should be possible (assuming the stripping does not break the ABI) to replace the stripped Fedora version with the complete RPM Fusion version at runtime, without recompiling dependent packages. (freetype-freeworld and qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld don't even include a -devel package, you just build against the Fedora version and make sure you don't have an rpath on %{_libdir}, ld.so does the rest.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
