[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379

Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Hello,

 - Please update to the latest version, 1.4.2.

 - Please use a more meaningful name for your archive, with:

Source0:
https://github.com/ilyak/libefp/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

 - Please don't mix spaces and tabs (line 7). Choose one on the other.

 - The library should be versioned:

>In cases where upstream ships unversioned .so library (so this is not needed for 
>plugins, drivers, etc.), the packager MUST try to convince upstream to start 
>versioning it.
>
>If that fails due to unwilling or unresposive upstream, the packager may start 
>versioning downstream but this must be done with caution and ideally only in 
>rare cases. We don't want to create a library that could conflict with upstream 
>if they later start providing versioned shared libraries. Under no circumstances 
>should the unversioned library be shipped in Fedora.

See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Downstream_.so_name_versioning

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux