[Bug 1497594] Switch to using git snapshots for flashrom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497594



--- Comment #5 from Alex G. <mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Hi David,

And welcome to the evil blue side.

It appears your specfile talks two the build system using two separate
mechanisms. One is flashrom_cflags environment variable, and the other one is
editing the Makefile.* on the-fly. For the sake of readability, you should
chose one mechanism and stick to it. I'm not sure if the flashrom buildsystem
needs modifications to support this, but since you are the upstream maintainer,
I'm certain this is trivial for you to do.


> $(echo "VERSION=%{shortcommit}" > Makefile.version)
> $(echo "MAN_DATE=$(date -u "+%Y-%m-%d")" >> Makefile.version)

This will give the date of whenever a package was built, not when the software
was last released/modified, which I assume is the intention of this variable.
Different packages (x64, x86, arm ,etc) end up with different values here,
because they are not built at the same time.

My third point is that I'm not convinced it's good practice to package
snapshots. I understand upstream's desire for users to always have the latest
git, however, from a package maintainer point of view, we prefer upstream
releases over snapshots. If you think that flashrom is adding features at a
fast pace, I believe it would be smarter to have upstream releases at shorter
intervals.

Hope this helps.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux