Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2007-08-12 04:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > mock rebuild on x86_64 show that: > > cc -shared -Wl,-soname=libGLEW.so.1.4 -o lib/libGLEW.so.1.4.0 src/glew.pic_o > -L/usr/X11R6/lib64 -lXmu -lXi -lGLU -lGL -lXext -lX11 > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXext > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make: *** [lib/libGLEW.so.1.4.0] Error 1 > Hmm, strange: [hans@shalem ~]$ rpm -q --requires libXmu-devel libXmu-devel-1.0.3-1.fc7.x86_64 libX11-devel libXext-devel <snip> And libXmu-devel is BR'd, anyways I'll just add libXext-devel to the BR's too, I'll do a new version with this fixed when a full review is done, as I dislike doing a zillion iterations. > My point of view about multilibs is that binaries have to be split into another > (-utils) package...But that won't breaks things if i386 and x86_64 are installed > together, indeed.. > I still don't know I don't necessarily object to having a -utils package, but the other glew submission has the docs seperate too, no I think that most of the docs should be moved to the -devel packahge, but splitting them off? All files in the combined packages way in at 1 MB combined, I think splitting this up 4 ways is over the top. I really only see 2 (3) reasons for splitting of any utility binaries from libs: 1) They drag in dependencies on which the lib itself doesn't depend 2) They take up lots of diskspace 3) The cause multilib conflicts (this is fixable by making scripts identical between the i3986 and x86_64 version though) Non of this is the case here, so I say lets just have a glew and a glew-devel (and move most of the docs to glew-devel, as they describe mostly the API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review