Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-09 10:39 EST ------- Mamoru, thanks for taking a look: (In reply to comment #7) Updated spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe.spec SRPM: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe-0.2-4.fc7.src.rpm - add comment re Source1..4 creation - mod .desktop category to Education, although some or all of the {Education, Graphics, DataVisualization, Geography, Amusement, ImageProcessing } might fit ? - del .desktop category deprecated items - del extraneous BR and Requires(post/postun) for desktop-file-utils > desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original \ When I followed other packages as an example, it seems that --delete-original was normal. Is this a changed packaging standard ? - mod desktop-file-install to simpler command, using SOURCEx - add ownership of app data directory - mod ownership of icon data to glglobe specific filenames (In reply to comment #8) - mod License to meet new Licensing Guidelines Changed but didn't work out rpmlint's unhappiness until I realized I hadn't updated rpmlint on that machine ;) Current spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe.spec Updated SRPM: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe-0.2-4.fc7.src.rpm A query: is it worth testing in fc6 and fdevel {my testing has been in f7}? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review