https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422198 --- Comment #12 from James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Alan Pevec from comment #10) > > Since the change is breaking and not compatible the Provides for > > python-docker-py ought to be dropped from the spec before building this: > > What exactly is breaking? https://pypi.python.org/pypi/docker links to the > same old docs site https://docker-py.readthedocs.io/ so old APIs should work > with python-docker. Is there evidence to the contrary? > > > "If a package supersedes/replaces an existing package without being a > > sufficiently compatible replacement as defined above, use only the > > Obsoletes: line from the above example." > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443577#c8 shows this is not > sufficient, f25 to f26 upgrades will break with file conflicts... Although Tomas has addressed a specific example I just wanted to note for future reference, and others, that linking to the same readthedocs site is never evidence for compatibility. If you check the site you'll note that 'stable' is in the URL when you first get to the page. If you look carefully, bottom right in this case, there's a version selector to pick a set of docs that matches the version of code. If you pick a pre 2.X version of the documentation the API is very different in places: http://docker-py.readthedocs.io/en/1.10.0/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
