https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490053 Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- # The source for this package was pulled from scidavis's vcs. # There hasn't been a 3.0.0 release yet, nor have the changes made in scidavis's liborigin been backported. # Use the following commands to generate the source package: # wget https://github.com/highperformancecoder/scidavis/archive/7c6e07dfad80dbe190af29ffa8a56c82a8aa9180/scidavis-7c6e07df.tar.gz # tar -xzf scidavis-7c6e07df.tar.gz # tar -cvJf liborigin3-3.0.0-7c6e07df.tar.xz -C scidavis-7c6e07dfad80dbe190af29ffa8a56c82a8aa9180/3rdparty/ liborigin I think it's not correct extracting a patched code from an archive and propose it as library that obsoletes the actual 'liborigin' libs. Has "liborigin3" been proposed to upstream? (https://sourceforge.net/projects/liborigin/) You could produce 'liborigin' from scidavis's vcs as a private SciDAVis library, as long as new changes are backported and tested as a new real 'liborigin' release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
