https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238382 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- I will be using the SPEC file and patch from your Github. SPEC URL: https://github.com/manisandro/fedora-mingw/raw/master/mingw-libspatialite/mingw-libspatialite.spec I seem to be missing some dependencies: DEBUG util.py:450: No matching package to install: 'mingw32-freexl' DEBUG util.py:450: No matching package to install: 'mingw32-geos' DEBUG util.py:450: No matching package to install: 'mingw32-libcharset' which are being reviewed by Juan Orti, so it's all good, I just need to build them. Almost everything is okay, but there are some obsolete macros used in configure.ac that you should patch: AutoTools: Obsoleted m4s found ------------------------------ AC_PROG_LIBTOOL found in: libspatialite-4.3.0a/configure.ac:87 AM_CONFIG_HEADER found in: libspatialite-4.3.0a/configure.ac:11 diff -up libspatialite-4.3.0a/configure.ac.fix_obsolete_m4s libspatialite-4.3.0a/configure.ac --- libspatialite-4.3.0a/configure.ac.fix_obsolete_m4s 2015-09-07 15:56:35.000000000 +0200 +++ libspatialite-4.3.0a/configure.ac 2017-09-01 12:02:03.804850737 +0200 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4]) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign]) AM_MAINTAINER_MODE -AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) +AC_CONFIG_HEADERS(config.h) # enabling huge-file support (64 bit file pointers) AH_TEMPLATE([_LARGE_FILE], @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ AC_PROG_INSTALL AC_PROG_LN_S AC_PROG_MAKE_SET AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL -AC_PROG_LIBTOOL +LT_INIT # Checks for typedefs, structures, and compiler characteristics. AC_C_CONST Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "LGPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "BSD (4 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "MPL (v1.1) GPL (v2 or later) or LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later)". 4640 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/mingw-libspatialite/review-mingw- libspatialite/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in mingw32-libspatialite , mingw64-libspatialite [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. Note: mingw32-libspatialite : /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys- root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/spatialite.pc mingw64-libspatialite : /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/spatialite.pc [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment. See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
