Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel@xxxxxxxx 2007-08-07 03:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > * I think there is a mixup in the installation section: make install > > SBINDIR=/usr/sbin doesn't do anything. > > Well, bins are installed in /usr/sbin > > > * shouldn't /usr/sbin be replaced by some %{value} (in .consolehelper)? > > As %{_sbin}/%{name}-gui ? yes, or %{_sbindir}/gtk-lshw for example > > * shouldn't /usr/bin be removed from .desktop launcher? > > Why? I want to launch /usr/bin/lshw-gui, not anything else. I noticed that (most of?) system-config*.desktop files don't honour $PATH but other applications (gimp-2.2.desktop, etc.) do. Is there a rule of thumb for this? > >I notice the the installed location is now /sbin. > > Yes, Lyonel said lshw* had to run as root, then they belong in /usr/sbin, > the consolehelper is of course in /usr/bin, see consolehelper(8) . > > > Is it the intent that gtk-lshw not be called through consolehelper, but > > lshw-gui is ? {I haven't experienc in this area}. > > A choice I made, the result is that normal users will not see the > gtk-lshw command, only lshw-gui. Don't a big problem? > > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review