Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel@xxxxxxxx 2007-08-06 20:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Note: The bug "duplicate"d tracks the original submitters requests of upstream > to make fedora specific changes to the upstream spec. Terje has since picked up > this package, and the initial discussions and changes to the package are > documented in the duplicated bug. > --- > Re: SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec > There is something a bit weird about the versions: the upstream Changelog log is > calling this B.02.12, while the src and this spec, web site call it B.02.11.01. > That's probably just an oversight. yes, my mistake. > --- > From: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess#head-f3a689ab03b01268036d0533d25e2fcfba3f38ea > "If the package is legally risky for whatever reason (known patent or copyright > infringement, trademark concerns) close the bug WONTFIX and leave an appropriate > comment (i.e. we don't ship mp3, so stop submitting it). Set the fedora-review > flag to -, and have the review ticket block FE-Legal." > > For an external trademarked logo, I believe you would have to get specific > permission to use the logo in other settings/software. I don't think it would > matter whether the image is an original from the owner of the trademark or > recreated by an upstream project, it would still be content that can't be included. > > I'll ask on f-devel-l whether such logos would be permissible content. > Lyonel: if we aren't able to use other entities' trademarks, can lshw-gui > operate if it can't find these images ? Would you be prepared to provide > alternative non-trademarked content - eg an artistic rendering like the images > of Apple boxes ? well... there isn't much to do with USB/SCSI/firewire logos :-) (I don't think these ones can be problematic, AMD/Intel/PowerPC might be) in any case, lshw-gui can of course operate without the logos > --- > I notice the the installed location is now /sbin. Is it the intent that gtk-lshw > not be called through consolehelper, but lshw-gui is ? {I haven't experience in > this area}. * I think there is a mixup in the installation section: make install SBINDIR=/usr/sbin doesn't do anything. * shouldn't /usr/sbin be replaced by some %{value} (in .consolehelper)? * shouldn't /usr/bin be removed from .desktop launcher? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review