[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794



--- Comment #3 from Ben Rosser <rosser.bjr@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Thanks for the review!

I don't wish to sound ungrateful, but I think you missed something:

> %define libname %(echo %{name} | sed -e 's/^ocaml-//')

It is preferred to use "global" over "define" for this sort of thing:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define

However, the OCaml package template (rpmdev-newspec -t ocaml), like most of
those templates, is sadly out of date and still uses %define, and I forgot to
change it before submitting the first batch of reviews. I meant to update this
submission too, but didn't get around to it before you reviewed the package. :)

I will fix this (and the other things you mentioned) on import. But I wanted to
say something here so you're aware that this is something to look for in other
package reviews.

Anyway, thanks again.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux