Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel@xxxxxxxx 2007-08-05 08:32 EST ------- Looks good to me. I'd have separated SVG cliparts from core lshw package, though: they're only used by lshw-gui. You are correct about the license: it is still GPLv2 (I still have no firm stance on GPLv3 so I decided to stick to a well-known and well-accepted license for now). Another useful trick w/ GUI could be an integration with Fedora's consolehelper (as lshw must be run as root to report anything useful) (In reply to comment #41) > New version is uploaded: > > SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec > SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-B.02.11-2.fc7.src.rpm > > I have verified that lshw-gui need lshw and that lshw is using data > from hwdata (if found). > > hwdata is not very frequent updated in Fedora, hence it's little value > in requiring hwdata. If this changes and lshw releases is slowing down, > hwdata can be a requirement in later lshw releases in fedora. > > License tag is changed to GPLv2 (as I read COPYING to be GPL versoin 2 only, > correct?) > > More information about license tag: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/60553 > > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review