https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359416 --- Comment #10 from Andrew J. Schorr <aschorr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi David, thanks for reviewing this! If I am reading your notes properly, I seem to see only one concern, regarding the licensing: >> License field should probably be (based on contents of binary rpm and how the rpm is built): GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ I ran licensecheck, and this seems to be due to the copyright in xml_puller.h and xml_puller.c. Is that correct? I will look into whether we can simply update the copyright in those files to GPLv3. Are there any other issues? Thanks, Andy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
