https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404895 --- Comment #14 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin (afk until next Thu) from comment #13) > You already said it, we can't ship exfat-utils, so we can't activate support > for it. I am sorry for being unprecise: My thoughts were about if we have to rip the code from the source tarball, thus if we have to create a custom tarball, e.g. like the openssl package. > >fail-mbr.bin.orig > As far as I know, we can't ship prepackaged binaries, so we must built it in > the SPEC. If it's only available on i386/x86_64, use the appropriate %ifarch > macro. Well, we could build the "binary" in question ourself and ship it as %SOURCE1 ourself (that's what Debian does); in the end it's a simple small binary with mostly NULL bytes (< 450 bytes in total), thus more or less easy to verify. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
