https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344276 --- Comment #36 from Sachidananda Urs <surs@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #35) > The easiest approach would be to make a new release, and > change the files to use GPLv3+. But you would need to ask > all contributors to agree to it. Likely just one line > replacement of /2/3/ for the files under GPLv2+. I will make a new release and change the files to GPLv3+. I spoke to the contributor and have consent. Will upload the new spec and sprm file. Thanks again. > > Files without a license header use the LICENSE file. But > IANAL, and this could be contested. But I do not suggest > patching the files to add a license header, as most if not > all are kind of trivial or non distributed files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
